Non-profit organizations as strategic arms of the food and beverage industry: Case studies in Europe

Abstract

Background
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are a key driver of Europe’s rising rates of obesity and non-communicable diseases. Although the food and beverage industry (F&BI) often challenges policies to reduce UPF consumption, relatively little is known about how industry-supported nonprofit organizations (NPOs) influence science, public opinion, and policy-making.
Objective
This study examines selected European NPOs with ties to the F&BI to understand their structures, activities, and potential role in shaping public policy.
Methods
We conducted a narrative review of scientific publications, grey literature, organizational documents, media coverage, and official websites. We used an exploratory, purposive sampling approach to identify relevant NPOs and selected them based on three criteria: (1) Funding from F&BI sources, (2) F&BI representatives in management roles, and (3) Activities with a potential conflict of interest.
Results
Five European NPOs were identified: International Life Sciences Institute Europe (ILSI Europe), European Food Information Council (EUFIC), British Nutrition Foundation (BNF), Fundación Española de la Nutrición (FEN), and Austria’s Forum Ernährung Heute (FEH). These organizations receive substantial industry funding and share leadership with the F&BI. They also engage in research and public communication activities that appear to advance industry interests, for example by downplaying the health risks of UPF. In addition, some of these NPOs are represented in influential policy forums.
Conclusions
Some F&BI-funded NPOs function as “astroturf” organizations. While their industry ties are often not visible, these groups can shape public and scientific discourse and influence policy-making processes. Strengthening transparency policies and conflict-of-interest regulations, and increasing awareness among scientists, policymakers and the public are critical to protect public health.